⚠️ Draft — Non-authoritative content (noindex)
INFORMATIVEDRAFT
Truth Source: Repository schemas and tests are authoritative.
Evaluation Dimensions
This page is a docs-side orientation page for evaluation questions. It does not create a frozen dimension taxonomy or an authoritative evaluator contract.
1. Purpose
Use this page to navigate common evaluation questions such as:
- schema validity
- evidence completeness
- version compatibility
- ruleset-based adjudication context
2. What This Page Can Safely Do
This page can safely point readers toward:
- repository-backed schemas and invariants for protocol-side validity
- repaired Validation Lab reference pages for ruleset/evidence-pack context
- downstream results pages for reporting terminology
3. What This Page Does Not Define
This page does not define:
- a frozen 6-dimension constitution
- pass/fail ownership for every evaluation question
- a canonical dimension-to-class matrix
- future version evaluation doctrine
4. Useful Evaluation Questions
The following questions remain useful as reading prompts, not as a separate constitution:
| Question | Read First |
|---|---|
| Do artifacts match repository-backed schemas? | repository-backed schemas and repaired module/profile pages |
| Is the evidence-pack/ruleset relationship understood? | Evidence Pack Contract, Ruleset Reference |
| Is protocol versioning being read in the correct domain? | Versioning Policy, Entry Points |
| Are adjudication targets understood? | Lifecycle Guarantees Reference |
5. Reading Order
- repaired spec/reference pages for the protocol object or profile in question
- repaired Validation Lab reference pages for evidence/ruleset context
- Results & Status for reporting terminology
6. References
Final Boundary: this page is a reading aid only. It does not create a frozen evaluation-dimension constitution.