Conformance Model

This page is a docs-side orientation surface for conformance-related reading. It does not establish a frozen class system, a final evaluation constitution, or an adjudication ownership model.

1. Purpose

Use this page to understand the reading order for:

evidence-oriented evaluation docs
repaired Validation Lab reference pages
the difference between protocol definition and evidence adjudication

2. Conservative Baseline

The strongest source-backed claims available here are:

conformance-related reading in docs is about evidence artifacts, not direct inspection of a live running process
repaired Validation Lab reference pages describe adjudication against versioned rulesets and evidence packs
repository-backed schemas, invariants, profiles, and taxonomy remain the protocol truth source

This page should not be read as creating additional protocol-layer conformance doctrine beyond those sources.

3. What This Page Does Not Define

This page does not define:

a canonical L1 / L2 / L3 conformance-class constitution
a final ladder of protocol maturity classes
a rule that passing a set of docs-defined flows yields a final conformance grade
evaluation ownership independent of repaired Validation Lab reference pages

4. Reading Order

For conformance-related reading, use this order:

5. Boundary

protocol semantics come from repository-backed protocol sources
adjudication reality comes from Validation Lab authority surfaces and their bound assets
this page is only a reading aid between those two

6. References

Final Boundary: this page is an orientation surface only. It does not create a new conformance doctrine for MPLP.

1. Purpose​

2. Conservative Baseline​

3. What This Page Does Not Define​

4. Reading Order​

5. Boundary​

6. References​