INFORMATIVEFROZEN
Truth Source: Repository schemas and tests are authoritative.
How to Evaluate MPLP
If You Are an Enterprise Architect
Goal: Assess technical fit and compliance posture
Reading Order (30 minutes):
- Architecture Overview — L1–L4 layer model
- Modules — 10 module specifications
- Golden Flows — Validation scenarios
- Standards Mapping — ISO/NIST/W3C alignment
- Enterprise Evaluation — Assessment checklist
Key Questions Answered:
- What does the protocol define?
- How do I verify implementation correctness?
- How does this relate to our compliance requirements?
If You Are an Auditor / Compliance Reviewer
Goal: Gather evidence and verify claims
Reading Order (60 minutes):
- Repo-Docs-Code Alignment (TBD) — Traceability
- Golden Flows — Validation evidence
- Standards Mapping — External alignment
- External Consistency Summary — Controls
- Phase G Verification — Surface consistency
Key Questions Answered:
- Are claims backed by artifacts?
- Is behavior testable?
- Are governance controls documented?
Verification Checklist
Before concluding your evaluation, verify:
- You understand the three-entry model (Website → Docs → Repo)
- You have read the Non-Claims section
- You understand who holds governance authority
- You know how to verify implementation correctness (Golden Flows)
- You understand the standards mapping scope and limitations
MPLP Documentation Governance 2025-12-21